If you experience any difficulties with this site, please contact the webmaster.

| Biography | Responses to Questions | Pastoral Summary | Sermon |
 

A higher resolution photo for printing is available for download here.

Note: If you have difficulty printing these web pages please use the download
links and print from
Word or Acrobat.

Biography:
Word  PDF

Questions:
 
Word PDF

Pastoral Summary:
Word PDF

Sermon:
 
Word PDF

The Rev Canon Pamela Jane Mott

The Rev Canon V Gene Robinson

The Very Rev Robert L Tate

     

Biography

"I firmly believe that Christ's good news was that God is with us, so that we can live as one in this earth, our island home. While my personal faith in God is a great resource for my life, and I do personalize God's love for me, I don't want to unbalance my relationship with the world, for that balance, that harmony, that inter-related unity is what the unfolding kingdom of God makes available."

The Very Reverend Ruth Lawson Kirk has been Rector of St. Peter's Church in Glenside, Pennsylvania, since 1993, and in 2000 was elected the Dean of Montgomery Deanery, overseeing 16 parishes. Within her congregation, she strengthens ministry by creating intergenerational programs and empowering lay leadership, and enables stewardship, recognizing that its practice leads to spiritual growth. She enjoys creating learning environments where individuals connect with one another and with the sacred, and encourages effective communication. In her view, primary administrative responsibilities include caring for her staff, "as Christian members of a team, working to assist the congregation in (its) ministry."

Her parish's sponsorship of three European pilgrimages (as part of the Journey to Adulthood program) is testimony to Ruth's focus on youth ministry. Her leadership and focus in this area reaches into the community: she serves on a multi-disciplinary team for the Office of Children and Youth in her county, reviewing cases and providing alternate perspectives to the social workers.

An alternate deputy to General Convention in 2003 and 2000, she has been a strong presence at diocesan convention, taking a firm stand on social issues, "in order that we engage our Baptismal Covenant's call to strive for justice and peace among all people, offering respect and dignity." After September 11th, on hearing that St. Paul's Chapel in New York needed volunteers, she organized a group of 14 to work an overnight 12-hour shift, plus two other shifts, ministering to the crews at Ground Zero. "Being on that
holy ground, surrounded by messages of love and support, my members and I were reminded that God is light for those sitting in the darkness, and hope for those who despair."

Ruth received a B.A. from Indiana University in 1983. Prior to seminary, she was a caseworker at Child Protection Services in Indianapolis (Marion County), Indiana, investigating and intervening in cases of physical abuse and neglect, incest, and child sexual abuse. She attended Virginia Theological Seminary, earning her M. Div. in May 1989. After four years as Assistant to the Rector of St. Paul's Church, Chestnut Hill, in Philadelphia, she was called to St. Peter's in Glenside.

Ruth and her husband Rick, a cabinetmaker, are parents of Matt, 11, and Sarah, 5. Among her favorite activities: playing with her kids, romping with the family dog, baking, flower arranging, camping/hiking, singing, and dancing.

"Consider the promise made at baptism when it was asked, 'Will you put your whole trust in Christ's grace and love?' We are always living into that answer, 'I will with God's help.' May our world, our nation, our homes and our hearts find compassion and humility as in God we trust."

Return to top

The Very Reverend Ruth Lawson Kirk
Responses to Questions

Describe three contemporary saints who have influenced your ministry.

The second verse of the hymn, "I sing a song of the saints of God," speaks of the saints who loved their Lord, whose love made them strong. One a soldier, one a priest, and one slain by a fierce wild beast in some ways this describes three of the saints who have influenced my ministry.

Martin Luther King Jr. was slain by the beast of racism. In college my honors thesis examined his work in the civil rights movement, wondering how far we'd come in reaching some of the goals for the beloved community. From his witness I gain the courage to speak and act as a witness for peace and true unity in the face of injustice and oppression.

A contemporary saint who has become a new influence in my life is Brother Roger of Taizé, France, whose community calls all denominations together on a pilgrimage of trust. Our 2002 youth pilgrimage included Taizé, where the music of prayer, the strength of community, and the depth of trust in God enlivened my faith. Brother Roger founded this place of prayer after the Second World War, and thousands of young people from around the world come seeking the power of God's love for life. I learn from Brother Roger that our shared faith is sustenance and life meeting a deep need for the whole world—a wonderful gift to be shared.

Jessie’s example and witness as a disciple of Christ impress me. Jessie is a member of St. Peter's in her mid 80's. If I didn't resist the militant imagery of the word, "soldier," that's how I'd describe her. Since I've known her she's been the first contact on our parish prayer chain, a hospice volunteer, meals on wheels delivery volunteer, nursing home volunteer, and lay eucharistic minister. She's also an opinionated feminist and an outspoken voice for tolerance and acceptance. While losing her own eyesight she supported her husband through his adagio to death. Jessie loves God with all her heart and mind and strength and loves her neighbors. Her stubborn faith gives me strength.

From all three saints I've learned of faith that calls for action, which informs and transforms relationships and situations so that others can come into a community alive with the blessing of God's grace and power.

What risk have you taken for the Gospel?

As I first thought about this, all I could think of were the Christians in the Sudan, in Nigeria, in nations where to be Christian is to be marginalized, persecuted, tortured or killed. When I compare that with my easy, middle class American upbringing, any sense of personal risk taking for the sake of the gospel is inconsequential. What possibility of suffering or harm has come to me because I follow Christ?

So there was the time at the diocesan convention (1996) when I spoke in favor of the resolution asking the next General Convention to authorize the development of rites for the blessing of same sex unions. I was pretty passionate about it, so much so that the Philadelphia Inquirer included a quote from the Rev. David Moyer and one from me, showing the juxtaposition of opinions among the diocesan clergy. Because of that press, two members of the vestry resigned, and a few families left St. Peter's. That loss hurt, but the remaining congregation's understanding of its mission was strengthened and new people have come. What real cost or risk was that?

Perhaps the greatest risk I have undertaken yet is to open myself for this call. My husband likes his work, my children are happy in their school, and I love my ministry in this congregation. If God truly calls me to leave this place behind and accept new responsibilities the loss will be great. The song from the Iona community (can you tell I love music?) found in our songbook, Wonder, Love and Praise, expresses the risk ahead of me in this mutual discernment. It sings, "Will you come and follow me, if I but call your name? Will you go where you don't know, and never be the same?" I will, with God's help.

How have you been called as a leader and a Christian to respond to the events of September 11th? How have you led your faith community to be a witness in the post September 11th world?

We'll all remember where we were when heard the news. I was dutifully driving to our diocesan clergy day. As I sat in the church with the program continuing as the bishop announced then prayed at the second plane's impact, then the fall of the first tower, I was unsettled by our attempts to continue business as usual. After the moment of silence, I stood up and spoke the words many held inside. The day needed to end so that we could go and be pastors with our people. Once back at St. Peter's, we created a large outside sign, "Open for Prayer," and prepared a booklet of prayers for an evening service. As I moved through that day my prayer was unceasing. More than 100 people gathered that might, offering the prayers of our hearts, crying the tears of sorrow, and praying for our enemies and for peace. Later that month I assisted the youth, who sponsored an interfaith prayer service. The themes of peace and reconciliation have flowed through our ministry as we pray and serve God.

As a Christian mother, I've tried to teach my children about how we know God's hope for our witness and our work. We've talked about violence, about guns, about bad guys who believe they really are the good guys, and good guys who are making bad decisions that break God's heart. Many conversations begin with a local event and end up referring to the global tensions and our faithful call to be reconcilers and healers, witnessing the power of love and self offering.

When I heard that St. Paul's Chapel in New York City needed volunteers, I organized group of 14 to work an overnight 12 hour shift, ministering to the crews at Ground Zero. Being on that holy ground, surrounded by messages of love and support, my members and I were reminded that God is light for those sitting in darkness and hope for those who despair. We served two other shifts as a congregation, sharing our stories with those who stayed behind. Our witness in the world today attempts to proclaim the presence of the Good Shepherd, whose power is made known as those who follow Christ enter the depths of the shadows, trusting in the never failing presence of God. A new peace fellowship is beginning in the parish as we pray for wisdom for the leaders of the world.

Identify three top issues or trends in the life of the Episcopal Church today and how you envision us as a diocese under your leadership relative to these issues and trends.

One of the most complicated issues is the tension between conservative and liberal approaches to the issues of gender and sexuality—with global dimensions and local implications. There is an interesting book out that is stirring my mind. It's called The Next Christendom: the Coming of Global Christianity by Philip Jenkins. His analysis of population trends and the Southern Hemisphere's rising Christian faith suggests a scary future for the liberal, white church of the North. The burgeoning southern church is more conservative and charismatic—we’re seeing that in the Anglican Communion, with bishops of Africa and Singapore sending missionaries to our United States. Northern conservatives are happily welcoming the trend, for it bolsters their disputes with progressive Christians over gender and sexuality issues.

Here's my local perspective: while my congregation attracts new members at a steady rate, offering connection and community where gays and lesbians are welcome and women preside and preach, the orthodox Presbyterian church down the block is outpacing us. Their preachers will tell you what to believe and where to find, by chapter and verse, the values that keep women in a certain place and gays and lesbians in a closet. Many people seem to be attracted to that kind of clarity, accompanied by pop music, video enhanced sermons, and an active servant ministry. There are many others who reject this fundamental approach to the gospel and so reject the community that Christ is to lead. I see the diocese of New Hampshire working actively among the college populations and with the youth who are more open to differences in sexual orientation and less bound by traditional gender roles. We'll increase our presence among them, showing the good news of Christ that liberates and transforms all people, inspiring just relationships that are creative and generous. The presentation and the worship need to speak their language, meet their desire to serve others and include them in developing and leading the present mission of the Church. The diocese must continue to call ordained leaders with integrity, who creatively proclaim a trustworthy God and lead vibrant communities of faith. Our charismatic leadership, our teaching of the scriptures interpreted by reason and historical scholarship, our inclusion and nurture for a whole community of faith, and our trust and reliance on God will keep the Gospel relevant and God's kingdom at hand no matter how scary the future.

Connected to the tension between conservative and liberal disputes over gender and sexuality is the issue of authority in a post modern world. At this point, I'm not referring to the definition of Anglican authority, that three legged footstool of scripture, tradition and reason. We Episcopalians are named for a model of authority in our organization that is decidedly hierarchical and out dated. We all are figuring out how to change the model of authority within the structure of the church to more closely match the way the human community communicates, connects and organizes itself in the computer age. A representative body for governance, a balance of powers, clarity of role and responsibility—all these help the Episcopal Church transition from our feudal roots to a networked, interdependent body where authority and power is shared. I would envision on going, online (and satellite) conversations to connect the diocese of New Hampshire in its ministry. I'd model a shared authority, build consensus and use technology to increase the bonds of connection within the diocese. The point then of the bishop's leadership is to hold the church in relationship, modeling the ministry of reconciliation and unity in New Hampshire.

The third issue is evangelism and discipleship in an apathetic age. National averages for Sunday's worship attendance in most congregations show less than half the membership present. Stewardship doesn't reflect our trust in and allegiance to the God of abundance. Many of our members have a serious case of affluenza—the disease of affluence, which leads to a reliance on wealth and status for life's meaning. The Church must give the unaffiliated a reason to care and a purpose for patterning their life after Christ. As we seek and serve Christ in all people, we've got to learn the skills of the evangelist, who will show interest in a neighbor's life and respond with care, inviting the neighbor into friendship with God and fellowship with a community of compassion. Our members, both lay and ordained, can identify what we're passionate about and what we're good at, those gifts for our ministry in the world.

As the unchurched experience our love in action, we can inspire a higher level of participation and a deeper sense of connection that makes life worth living, turning apathy into love, for Christ’s sake.

Return to top

RÉSUMÉ HIGHLIGHTS
The Very Rev. Ruth Lawson Kirk

• PASTORAL CARE: I listen carefully to all who come seeking counsel. To them I prayerfully speak the truth in love, and refer to professional therapists as appropriate. I enjoy connecting with people where they are, bringing the strength of my faith into the present moment.

• TEACHING: Something I enjoy is to create learning environments where individuals connect with one another, with a concept or text and with the sacred. I’ve worked to develop a teaching style that is not didactic, but experiential. Some of the best work I’ve done at St. Peter’s has been our intergenerational programs, which creatively engage learners of all ages with the stories and themes of Christian faith.

• MINISTRY WITH AND TO CHILDREN AND YOUTH: One of my strengths is to connect with young people, honoring God’s wisdom and spirit within them and among us. St. Peter’s supports youth ministry, which has included three youth pilgrimages to Europe as a part of the Journey to Adulthood program. I’m an active participant in that program, and value their gifts for ministry. Perhaps the greatest compliment of my ministry was from a 2 ½ year old member, whose mother reported Brigid’s words, “Ruth really loves me.”

• CONGREGATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: When I arrived at St. Peter’s the congregation was recovering from unresolved clergy misconduct and a subsequent rector’s mismatch with a term more like an interim’s. Through a series of retreats with constant themes of mission and community development, by the careful nurturing of leadership and my own learning, we are a strong, vibrant, healthy, open and safe congregation.

• STEWARDSHIP AND EVANGELISM: In nine years of ministry, I’ve taught St. Peter’s members not to be afraid of evangelism. I work with a small team to creatively (read on a shoestring) empower members to draw people into our fellowship and into relationship with God. I work with another team to form the congregation as stewards, recognizing that the practice of stewardship leads to spiritual growth.

• ECUMENICAL AND INTERFAITH WORK: From my days at VTS as a representative to the Washington Theological Consortium, I have always believed that the boxes we draw are not the boxes in which God chooses to dwell. I have an active partnership with my Lutheran colleague in Glenside, was convener of the local ministerium for two years, briefly served on the board of the Metropolitan Christian Council of Philadelphia and am involved in an Urban-Suburban partnership that acts to bridge racial, denominational and regional boundaries.

• LEADERSHIP IN OUTREACH AND SOCIAL JUSTICE: When a teenager was beaten to death on the steps of his RC church in our township, I joined with other community leaders to form a taskforce that addresses the concerns of youth in order to create connection and prevent violence. I currently serve on a Multi-disciplinary team for the Office of Children and Youth in our part of the county, to review cases and provide an alternate perspective for the DPW social workers. I encourage members of the congregation to use their gifts in order that we engage our baptismal covenant’s call to strive for justice and peace among all people, offering respect and dignity. I pray my own efforts serve as a witness.

• ADMINISTRATION, INCLUDING RESPONSIBILITY FOR PERSONNEL AND FINANCE: Working in ministry teams takes effective communication, which I model and encourage. In nine years as a rector, I have gained skills in financial management, becoming a stronger leader in creating balanced budgets, and maintaining fiscal responsibility. With regard to personnel, I believe one of my primary administrative responsibilities is to care for the staff as members of a team working to assist the parishioners in their ministry. Four of the five staff members currently in the team have served St. Peter’s for five years or more. By developing job descriptions, delegated areas of staff responsibility are clearly defined. In 2001, I proposed the development of the part time administrative position to a full time parish administrator and business manager. This provides the congregation a more effective use of my time and talents for leadership, teaching and pastoral care, leaving the parish administration to a professional. With good communication and cooperation among us, we enjoy the work.

Return to top
 

Sermon for Fourth Advent - Year A
December 23, 2001
The Very Rev. Ruth Lawson Kirk


“Look, the young woman is with child and shall bear a son, and shall name him Immanuel.” These were the words recorded, the prophecy Isaiah spoke to the king of Judah. Ahaz was king over the southern kingdom, and as the story of most nations histories, his land was threatened by powerful neighbors, all wanting to overthrow his government and rule his territory. Tiglath-Pileser the third was stirring up his armies from Babylon, ready to conquer all the kingdoms between the river Euphrates and the Mediterranean, all the lands now so much in our news. The story of the nations has not changed very much. The kingdom of Edom to the west, and Israel and Syria to the north were all threatening the little kingdom of Judah. As the story goes, in the verses right before our passage, King Ahaz has gone outside the walls to check on the aqueduct, for Jerusalem had no wells, no source of flowing water to supply a besieged town.

Now the word of the Lord is strong with Isaiah. His message is really quite simple. Ahaz needs to remember and trust that God, the Lord of heaven and earth, is in charge. And though the nations threaten to undo Judah and conquer Jerusalem, Ahaz should trust in God anyway, for God holds the fate of nations in God’s hand, and will work out God’s purpose for the people. In order to guarantee Isaiah’s word is true, he offers to Ahaz a sign, proof of the prophecy’s authenticity. But Ahaz demurs, quoting Deuteronomy’s word not to put God to the test. They all know that Ahaz has already decided to summon the big bad nation, Assyria, to help him with the other problematic neighbors.

So Isaiah offers the sign anyway. A young woman’s pregnancy will result in a child’s birth, and the son will be named “Immanuel” which means God with us. The son of Ahaz? The son of Isaiah? It’s not really clear whose young wife will give birth, but the sign is for that present tension among those neighbors, for before the child is eating solid foods, Israel to the north and Syria to the east will be destroyed. And then? Well, if you trust in the power of a power hungry king, you will be affected by him. His coming, so Isaiah prophesied in later chapters, Tiglath-Pileser’s coming will bring judgment and destruction upon the people of Judah.

Immanuel, the sign of God with us, can signal either judgment or salvation.

When we approach the feast of Christmas, we hear the words, Immanuel, God with us, and our minds jump to the incarnation of Christ Jesus, God taking human form, coming in the midst of poverty, the birth of a baby to Mary and Joseph. That was not the intention of the prophet Isaiah, but it was the intention of the evangelist, Matthew. He wanted readers to believe that Jesus, son of God, Messiah, was the fulfillment of the scriptures. Those scriptures were so familiar and powerful to the Jewish Christians to whom Matthew wrote, as they are powerful and familiar to us. Matthew wants to teach believers through the ages that Christ Jesus is the fulfillment of the sacred writings of old. It’s not a stretch of the imagination.

If you were to pull out your bibles, as the Rite-13 class did, you’d see that Matthew begins his gospel with the family tree of Jesus, a tree that includes a mixed race couple, among other gems of his ancestors. Matthew wants his readers to know that Jesus is from the royal line of David, but he reminds those readers that Gentiles and foreigners are deeply rooted in that tree. The “begot”s” show us a Messiah emerging from the stalk of Jewish history. Then Matthew turns to the story we heard as gospel today, a rich character to proclaim the Messiah’s good news.

In a dream Joseph comes to understand that God is at work in his life and in his betrothed’s, Mary. The angel uses the words of Joseph’s scriptures to teach him of God’s will. Before the dream, Joseph is righteous in that he is compassionate enough to submit his own honor so as to lessen Mary’s shame. After all, it was within his right to publicly humiliate Mary, taking back the bride-price and keeping her father’s dowry, and making sure the town gossips heard every word of his disdain. Yet Joseph had compassion for Mary, and swallowed his pride so as to protect a little of her honor.

After the dream, Joseph is willing to trust God’s purpose for his life, and to entrust his own life to the will of God which flouts customs and institutions. Who cares what the neighbors think? For Joseph it was more important to consecrate his life for God’s purpose. The same was for Mary, but Matthew isn’t telling her story. He wants the reader to learn from Joseph what it means to trust God, not just trusting the conventional wisdom, or the words on the page, but trusting in the active power of God in the imagination and the dreams - the spirit of God from within which calls him to a greater commitment and a deeper faith.

Can you imagine the measure of his humility? The depth of his trust? Even 2000 years later there are men who care more about society’s perception of their honor, and don’t care who they have to trample to be respected and esteemed by others. Matthew holds up Joseph for us to learn from, for Joseph trusted in God, listened to his dream’s angel, trusted it was possible for God to work outside the box of convention and custom, and accepted the son of Mary’s womb as his own, naming him Jesus, which means God saves.

So what can we learn from Ahaz and Joseph for our lives today? Do we believe that God is the creator of the earth and source of life? Do we believe that God’s power is a present and real source in which we can put our trust or will we connive like Ahaz, and manipulate life’s change by our associations.

Can we see in the on-going power struggles of the Middle East some way for the advent of Immanuel? God’s coming means salvation, and it means judgment for those who claim to live under his power. Will those who know the God of Abraham put aside their own desire for power, for territory, and submit their own pride so that they can hear the prophecy of God?

Can we?

When I think about God with us, I start with the comfort, the assuring love, the mercy of the child born in Bethlehem. I personalize it, moving from the second person plural, - us - to the second person singular, - me- . There is comfort, and strength in believing and trusting God is with me. The Lord is My shepherd.

If I’m not careful, God with me, becomes God is on my side against all my foes, real or imagined. If I’m not careful, God with me becomes God not with you – a power I can manipulate for my own benefit and status, a symbol of my pride. That is when the judgment of God with us becomes heavy.

The story of King Ahaz teaches me that God will not be used as a walk-on character in someone else’s drama. Joseph teaches me that God with us can mean choosing to lay aside my personal pride, my sense of success or failure, and simply be that which God wills in God’s unfolding drama of creation. What I learn from Ahaz and Joseph, what Matthew and Isaiah are trying to teach me, is that when God is with me, God is also with my foe, to bring us all under the power of God’s compassion and God’s judgment. As I trust in God’s presence in my life, and look for the signs of God’s activity in the world, I will need to submit my own pride and will at times, that God’s new way might be accomplished. What Matthew and Isaiah are trying to teach me, is to trust that God is at work in wonderful, mysterious, common, and holy ways. In the words of that wonderful prayer for adolescents, these mens’ stories teach me not to take failure as a measure of my worth, but as a chance for a new start as God’s willing actor.

Even if only for this moment, consider what it means for you to trust in God, to really trust in God. Consider the ways in which you withhold your trust, and misplace it in institutions and people, allies and instruments which by their nature are limited and faulty. Consider the promise made at baptism when it was asked, “Will you put your whole trust in Christ’s grace and love?” We are always living into that answer, “I will with God’s help.” May our world, our nation, our homes and our hearts find compassion and humility as in God we trust.

Return to top
 

 

© 2002-2004 The Diocese of New Hampshire
The Bishop Search site is designed and maintained by CherWare

This site was last updated on
03/10/2004 11:21 PM -0600