|







If you experience any difficulties
with this site, please contact the
webmaster.
| |
 |
Focus Groups
|
During late June, fifteen focus groups convened
throughout the Diocese of New Hampshire, to discuss the Bishop Search
process. A brief moderator’s guide was provided to every congregation,
with suggested discussion topics. At every focus group, a scribe was
assigned the task of recording responses and key points. The first focus
group was held by the clergy during a Clergy Day at St. Paul’s School,
Concord. By the end of June, all six diocesan Convocations—Northern,
Southern, Central, Western, Seacoast, and Lakes—held a focus group at a
central location. In addition, eight parishes of all sizes in various
parts of the state held individual focus groups.
The role of the bishop was defined by the majority
as Pastor, Leader, Teacher, and Communicator. The Bishop’s desired primary
focus was determined to be support of clergy/pastoral care, outreach,
vision for growth and development, being internally visible and active,
stewardship, and evangelism. The Bishop’s secondary focus:
responsibilities outside diocese to regional, national, and worldwide
church, Administration and delegation, strong fiscal management, making
statements on the issues of the day, and making frequent visits to
congregations. Participants stated that the next bishop should not burn
out or be a workaholic, micro-manage or be a control freak, get too
involved in the National church, get bogged down on only 1 or 2 social
issues, or try to be all things to all people. The most desired qualities
in the next bishop: Spiritual and spirit-filled, compassionate, faithful,
possessing a sense of humor, accessible, a moral leader, and a visionary.
Existing strengths in the diocese were identified
as small size, dynamic bishop, clergy support, committed and determined
people. Suggested areas for improvement: follow-through on mission and
outreach, better levels of stewardship and charitable giving, reaching out
more effectively to the unchurched, vision for supporting small or growing
parishes.
In addition to the findings already described, the
survey and focus groups reflected a strong affection and admiration for
Bishop Douglas Theuner, and an appreciation of his 17-18 years of service
to this Diocese. At the same time, respondents were forward-looking, with
a desire to take advantage of an unavoidable change in leadership.
|
|
|
|