Conclusions

Episcopalians in New Hampshire hope the next bishop will work for the betterment of the diocese by expanding the membership and increasing the effectiveness of the faithful in their individual and collective ministries.

The Episcopal Diocese of New Hampshire seeks a spiritually alive, pastorally responsible leader with a sense of humor and the ability to communicate theology, one who will be more visible and visibly active within the state of New Hampshire than involved in the national Church. The next bishop is challenged to promote youth and young adult ministries, speak and act against racism and injustice, support lay ministry, continue to deploy women clergy, and make an annual Sunday visitation to each congregation. There is a desire for strategic vision, fiscal integrity, and stewardship, but moderate agreement that the bishop should be a strong administrator or a prophetic voice on social and political issues.

The people desire a leader who upholds and supports social and political justice, yet does not carry the baggage of a social or political agenda into office. This preference indicates a determination not to impair the overall cohesion and unity of purpose within the diocese. Tolerance and inclusiveness are valued with regard to diversity of thought, opinion, lifestyle, race, gender, sexual orientation, and upholding and cherishing church tradition. However, there is no obvious mandate for the next bishop to vigorously promote inclusive language liturgies, the blessing of same-sex relationships, or the ordination of openly gay and lesbian clergy.

There is a strong feeling that the next Bishop of New Hampshire should be a dedicated shepherd to lead and nurture a devoted flock. Episcopalians in the Granite State welcome that person called to recognize and value the unique character and geography of this diocese, and as its spiritual and functional head, help its clergy and laity define and make real their vision for ministry.

| Introduction | Methodology | Demographic Profile | Analysis of Results |
| Focus Groups | Conclusion |